On this year’s ballot, voters will have a choice regarding whether Martin County should continue to elect its school superintendent or have the superintendent appointed by the School Board.
Only Florida and Alabama continue to have elected superintendents; Mississippi just ended the practice. In Florida, it is up to the voters in each school district to determine whether to elect their superintendents. Out of 67 districts in the state, 41 continue to have superintendents chosen through elections. The larger districts, including Miami/Dade, Broward, Palm Beach and St Lucie, all have appointed superintendents. The Martin County School District ranks higher than those other four do.
The most compelling reason to have the superintendent appointed is that the school board members can search throughout the country to find the most qualified candidates. This would result in someone who has all the right credentials being selected. Right now, you must be 21, live in the district and not be a felon to be qualified to run for superintendent. By having an appointed superintendent, the politics are removed from the position. Since the superintendent reports to the board, if enough friction develops between them, the board can remove the superintendent.
It is quite true that elections are messy. They are to some extent popularity contests. Unqualified people are elected to positions of authority all the time. Voters make mistakes. But those mistakes are usually corrected at the next election. Besides, is some friction between a board and superintendent necessarily a bad thing?
As citizens and voters, we are slowly giving up our rights for expediency’s sake. Our local governments are run by supposed experts instead of having the people choosing strong mayors and county executives. Billions of tax dollars are in the hands of unelected people. This is not democracy. We are a little less free because of it. I don’t even believe that we are necessarily in more capable hands.
By voters giving up a little more in the name of “better government,” we become a little more removed from our government. Any bureaucracy, whether a private business or a public entity, works best when the shareholders, taxpayers and citizens are as close to the levers of power as possible. To enjoy the fruits and benefits of a democratic society, it is imperative that citizens are an integral part of the process.
And we shouldn’t decide the question based on a like or dislike of any one elected superintendent or school board member. That would be like saying we don’t want to elect the president anymore because the current one is not our choice or very good at the job. As a nation and a people, we don’t believe in setting up a dictatorship so that our nation runs efficiently.
It is hard to decide whether an appointed or elected superintendent is best. There are good points to both sides of this argument. After I have examined the pros and cons, I am going to be voting in favor of electing the superintendent. I believe that the people will get it right more times than not. If we entrust our nation to elect someone president with the only qualifications being an age requirement, being born in the United States and a resident for the past 14 years; then I think we will survive electing a bad superintendent once in a while.