Hobe Sound Remains Unincorporated

Posted on by

We haven’t seen much analysis of why the incorporation of Hobe Sound was so strongly defeated.

Perhaps much of it has to do with the proponents not making their case adequately. If you are proposing a new government, you need to tell the people why. The answer cannot be, “We want to keep everything the same.” The plan was to keep the Sherriff, keep Martin County Fire/Rescue, and have the County provide most of the services as they do now. What was the purpose then of incorporation? Why ask the citizens to pay more in taxes if you are not giving a definitive benefit?

As Indiantown is finding out, all government has a cost. I believe in government being as local as possible. Government should function as a government providing, at the minimum, all municipal services except perhaps public safety. And, in a town of Hobe Sound’s size, even public safety should be in the mix in the future.

With the ascension of Harold Jenkins to the BOCC, people felt that their interest was being represented. Jenkins did support incorporation. This would have been a done deal anywhere else but in Martin County. Unfortunately for the proponents of incorporation, Hobe Sound is in Martin County.

 

Brightline Is Coming

Posted on by

Do you remember the first time you heard about Brightline?

It was the high-speed rail that was supposed to be financed privately? Well it just received $1.15 billion in tax-free bonds to expand from Palm Beach through Martin, the Treasure Coast and all the way to Orlando. Brightline is on its way through Stuart.

I could give you several economic arguments why this 19th century technology should not happen. But this no longer has anything to do with economics. This is now, in actuality, if not in name, a PPP (private-public partnership). And, it is heavy on the public part. While the railroad executives will swear that this is still a private sector enterprise, they would be lying.

The Feds and Florida have decided that taxpayer dollars should be used to build the infrastructure of a private company. Governor Scott and his wife own a large share of stock in the parent group and in a Chinese company that will benefit from helping build the trains. Once again, the rich and powerful helping themselves, to the people’s detriment.

Those bonds would never have been successfully sold in the private market. Since they are tax-free, they will do just fine. Investors now realize that both Tallahassee and Washington will support this endeavor regardless of the economic realities. If Brightline is inevitable, as I believe it is, then what should Stuart and Martin County do?

The first thing is acceptance. Stop fighting and see how we can take advantage of a bad situation. If Brightline wants to put a station in Stuart, then work with them so as many trains stop here as practical each day. Make sure Brightline purchases property for a stop at an appropriate place so that it does not hurt the Downtown corridor. Stuart needs to keep in mind that Brightline will not operate at high speed through most of the City.

Take them at their word that they are a private company and under no circumstances give away our local tax dollars to incentivize this.

In the next fifty years, we will be spending millions to repair crossings. This is regardless of whether Brightline brings us benefits such as a local station or not. I still believe that their passenger rail concept will fail. At some point, the government will come in and take over the money-losing proposition. When they do, in 5 or 10 or 15 years, Amtrak or Tri-Rail will inherit that station.

In a convoluted way that was what was to happen a decade ago when Amtrak was to bring rail service to Stuart with a multi modal station. When Brightline really does become public, a true commuter line can be established. This will allow an easy commute south, fulfilling an idea that should have been planned decades earlier. Unfortunately, this is no way to run a transportation network.

Stuart and Martin County now should make lemonade from the bushels of lemons our communities have been pelted with.

From August 25th Friends & Neighbors

Posted on by

PINELAND PRAIRIE

 It appears that no one has a bad word to say about Pineland Prairie. Approximately 20 people spoke in favor at the meeting. From Jackie Trancynger to the Guardians to the head of the Builders Association, the speakers including myself urged, approval of the development. And why wouldn’t Martin County rally around this plan? It creates a walkable village and leaves 70% in open space or for schools.

This plan is a big PUD. The great thing about PUDs are that the Commission and staff can help direct what and how the property is developed. This isn’t proscribed to an extent that doesn’t leave an opportunity for all stakeholders to have a say. In my opinion, all development should be PUDs. So, you would think this would be a perfect opportunity for any Commissioner not just to scowl and criticize but try and incorporate their ideas and objections into the project.

In this instance I heard the complaints, but no one said I would like this or that included or eliminated. This, I believe, was a mistake on the Commission’s part. Mr. Kiplinger and his development team took the time (over a year) to meet with all. This was any and every Commissioner’s chance to have input into the development.

The final vote was 4-1 to approve with Commissioner Heard dissenting.

***

To subscribe to the entire newsletter for free: tomcampenniforstuart.com

 

Amendment One & the Real Estate Tax System

Posted on by

Once again, the Florida Legislature is attempting to give a tax reduction by taking it from local government.

In November the voters will be asked to pass a constitutional amendment so that a little more than 10% of those properties being homesteaded can save a few bucks. This is a bate and switch that will raise taxes on business and seasonal residents. The very economic sectors that keep Florida’s economy humming.

It is impossible not to comment on the entire Florida real estate tax system when looking at Amendment 1. While there could be as many as 18 constitutional amendments on the ballot this November, Amendment 1 is a legislative initiative to give a third Homestead Exemption. Like all constitutional initiatives in Florida, it must pass with 60% of the vote.

It is estimated by the Florida League of Cities that, if passed, this amendment would benefit 12% of the homeowners in Florida. It would have no effect on the school taxes levied. School Board taxes in many instances are higher than municipal and/or county taxes paid by a homesteaded homeowner or condo owner. Anyone who has a home with an assessment of under $100,000 would see no benefit. There would be no benefit to any resident paying rent. There would be no benefit to any non-homesteaded property owner. There would be no benefit to business property owners.

It is anticipated that Martin County will see a loss of $6,500,000 in real estate tax collection. The County is already anticipating a millage increase. The passage of this amendment may precipitate a larger increase in the tax rate. One Florida Senator who is in favor of passage said on the Senate floor that localities can just raise the millage to make up the difference.

Since roughly 88% of the properties in Florida will see no benefit, this is a “tax shift” and not a reduction. The Florida Legislature has for the past decade tried to reduce “home rule” authority.  Using artificial property tax cuts, local government’s ability to pay for services become more and more constrained. At the same time the Legislature has increased mandates without adequate state funding.

The property tax system in Florida is broken. As the tax burden has shifted to fewer and fewer property owners through the use of exemptions, caps and other legislative sleights of hand, there has been a disconnect for a substantial number of people between services demanded and the costs of such services. This situation is becoming more and more unsustainable.

Besides being poor tax policy, it is bad social and economic policy. Two identical homes owned by residents that are side by side can have two different tax amounts based on each property’s exemptions and caps. This disparity results in thousands of dollars in tax differential. Economically, by the shifting of the tax burden to tenants, business owners and nonresidents, you inhibit growth and the creation of new business. “Ad valorem” means a tax levied as to the value of the property assessed. This clearly is no longer the case in Florida.

It would be better for property taxes to be left to localities to levy. Further a millage rate should be applied equally to as many taxpayers as possible. An unequal system of taxation has developed because of the subversion of what ad valorem taxes should be.

Amendment 1 is not a tax cut but a tax shift. It should be defeated in November.

 

Martin County Taxpayer’s Association Review of Martin County’s Special Assessment for Fire Service

Posted on by

The mission of the Martin County Taxpayer’s Association (MCTA):

“To monitor and review all fiscal and tax matters affecting Martin County. To engage public officials, community leaders and private sector organizations who may influence the economy and efficiency of the County of Martin, the School District, municipalities and other taxing authorities in the matter of taxes and the financial resources of the County.”

In accordance with this mission a review was undertaken by the MCTA of the Martin County’s Special Assessment for Fire Services (Fire Fee.)

For some time now, the City of Stuart has had a Fire Fee to help pay for providing fire service. Many Florida local governments, including Broward County, have also instituted Fire Fees. The Florida Legislature, under constitutionally protected “Home Rule Authority,” has authorized local governments to charge several special assessments and fees. The specific authority is granted to county governments under Chapter 125 of the Florida Statutes.

There was a study performed by Government Services Group, Inc. (GSG) for Martin County. The study presented several scenarios as to how a Fire Fee could be implemented. It is important to know that the methodology to determine the Fire Fee needs to conform to statute and legal requirements. MCTA assumes that the methodology being used to determine the Fire Fee by Martin County meets all legal requirements.

Martin County Board of County Commissioners (BOCC) voted to institute the Fire Fee on July 24. The BOCC adopted the Fire Fee by using one of the choices that was outlined in the GSG study. The rationale in doing so, according to their literature, “is to have a dedicated, equitable and stable funding source to pay for fire protection and prevention services benefiting property in Marin County.” The BOCC contends that their present source for funding of fire services is unstable since it relies solely on ad valorem taxes.

To quote the county’s educational handout:

  • Property values fluctuate over time, resulting in an unpredictable funding stream.
  • Properties are taxed based on assessed value. This means the tax collected for one property may be different when compared to properties of a similar type.
  • Florida Constitutional Amendments are passed from time to time which increase property tax exemptions. Each property tax exemption reduces the county’s ad valorem revenue which funds fire services.
  • If the proposed Florida Constitutional Amendment 1, the Homestead Exemption increase, passes in November, staff anticipates a decrease of $2 million in ad valorem funding from the Fire Rescue MSTU (Municipal Service Taxing Unit). With an operating budget of $2.45 million, this loss in revenue would have a substantial negative impact on the Fire Rescue MSTU operating budget.

The Fire Fee will charge different amounts for several property classifications. Regardless of size or value, residential units will be billed a flat rate per dwelling of $151. Nonresidential properties have three different categories. Commercial properties will have a rate of $0.32 per square foot. Industrial/warehouse will have a rate of $0.05 per square foot and institutional properties a rate of $0.24 per square foot.

Churches and not-for-profit organizations will be exempt from the Fire Fee. The BOCC has created an economic hardship program to assist homesteaded property owners who meet the requirements yet undetermined.

Fire protection is currently funded using the Fire MSTU. That MSTU not only funds the fire portion but also the medical/transport section of the Fire/Rescue Department. By statute the ambulance transport and emergency medical services cannot be funded through the Fire Fee. Therefore the “Fire” MSTU will undergo a name change and beginning in 2019 be called the EMS MSTU.

The proposed budget for the Fire/Rescue Department in 2019 is $43,763,556. The department will be funded in the following manner: 45 percent through the EMS MSTU, 29 percent through the Fire Fee, 16 percent through insurance re-imbursement, transport fees and miscellaneous revenues.

The BOCC has chosen to fund the fire protection portion using the Fire Fee at 50 percent of the total. That means every residential home owner will pay $151.00 regardless of the value of the home after homestead exemptions are applied. The BOCC for illustrative purposes uses the average amount of a home in Martin County. The amount as stated in the literature provided by the BOCC is $246,950, minus $50,000 in Homestead Exemptions the taxable value drops to $196,950. The 2019 MSTU, as currently constituted without a Fire Fee, is 2.6319 which equates to $518.35, which would be collected on the average home. Under the proposed formula the EMS MSTU would have a rate of 2.0137 which for the average home would be $396.59 plus the Fire Fee of $151 for a total of $547.59.

Members of the Legislative Committee of the MCTA met with Chief William Schobel and Deputy County Administrator George Stokus to discuss the Fire Fee. Most of the information cited above was provided to us by Martin County government.

We would have much preferred if the BOCC in their analysis had used the residential median instead of the average home value. The median is much more illustrative of what the typical resident would pay rather than an average.

We also believe that, by every property owner paying some amount to the cost of fire protection, all homeowners will understand that a relationship exists between the amount of service requested and that which is provided.

The Legislature, using exemptions and other Save Our Homes legislation, have placed the burden to fund local government on fewer and fewer taxpayers. A disconnect has developed between voters who demand services but are exempt from paying their share of taxes to fund such services. This leaves commercial property owners and a small number of expensive residential properties to pay for government. The use of a Fire Fee over continued ad valorem tax increases makes all homeowners pay something. This causes those homeowners to be interested in the services that their dollars buy.

In this report, the MCTA did not study what expenses are paid from the General Fund that are used in the operation of the Fire/Rescue Department. Accounting, Legal, Human Resources, County Administrator, and perhaps other Martin County Departments provide direct and indirect services to the operation of the Fire/Rescue Department. It does not appear that those ancillary costs are charged to the department. Perhaps the MCTA will investigate that matter in the future.

An assessed Fire Fee removes the pressure from County government regarding the MSTU cap of 10 mils. This Fire Fee gives the BOCC the ability to fund government and not reach the cap. The Fire Fee is a valuable tool, but it does not relieve the BOCC of the responsibility to make sure that our tax dollars are well spent. It is county management and county commissioners’ obligation to ensure that all possible savings and cost reductions are considered.

The MCTA can support the imposition of the Fire Fee if the BOCC reduces the new EMS MSTU by a corresponding amount.

 

The Stuart City Commission Election

Posted on by

A few weeks back Gil Smart wrote a story in the Stuart News regarding the Stuart Commission races. He portrayed the decision as experience over youth. I see It differently. I believe that it should be about whom the Commissioners represent.

If it were just about experience, however, then I would contend that Mike Meier has more government experience than his opponent, Nick Blount. Mike is on the CRB and has had to cast more votes than Nick, who was only recently appointed to the City Commission. Meier has attended far more Commission meetings than his opponent and has met with staff on numerous occasions to understand the issues.

Blount is retired from FPL where he was a government relations executive. Meier is an owner of Ground Floor Farms where he and his partners employ close to 20 people during season. Both have served on various community associations and boards.

In the other Commission race, Troy McDonald has been a Commissioner for almost a decade. He has been on the MPO and the Business Development Board representing the City Commission. McDonald was a candidate to succeed Ed Fielding on the BOCC but dropped out of that race shortly after Stacey Hetherington filed for the seat.

Both McDonald and his opponent, Merritt Matheson, own businesses. McDonald owns a legal process serving company and Matheson owns and manages real estate in downtown. He also works at a marine store where he runs the fishing department. Merritt is a member of the LPA, which is where development projects are vetted before going to the Commission. Like Meier, he has attended Commission meetings for more than a year.

What sets the candidates apart? Three of the four are business owners and one is a retired executive, so all have shown an ability in business to differing degrees. McDonald has the most governmental experience and Blount the least. But how much does that matter? Our current Congressman had no prior experience in elected office. All three candidates challenging Commissioner Heard running for the District 4 seat on the County Commission are without electoral experience.

I have been with both Meier and Matheson when they have taken time from their businesses to volunteer in the community. They did this not as part of their employment but as part of their commitment. Both have contributed their own funds to purchase school supplies or buy a meal for someone in need.

It appears to me that the difference is that Meier and Matheson want to represent Stuart residents. They are interested in more than just the people who call Stuart home during the work day, or at night while out dining. You can see this difference in who likes the candidates respective Facebook pages and, more importantly, who contributes to their campaigns.

A Stuart City Commissioner should represent the residents of Stuart.

Commissioners are there to listen to their concerns, wants and needs. In the past year or so, this Commission has been more enamored of “the Osceola crowd” over the people of Palm City Road. Transparency has suffered. There is still no streaming of meetings. The last-minute pay increase and Blount’s appointment without allowing citizen input are emblematic of a disregard for residents. And the rhetoric about what was said on the dais doesn’t matter if their vote did not reflect the words spoken.

Experience didn’t help when the Commission chose the last City Manager. Or when they ignored the reasons so many senior staff left. It wasn’t as if employees didn’t try to bring matters to their attention. Longevity in life or in elected office doesn’t bestow wisdom or knowledge on our elected officials.

This is not a matter of experience measured in years but of integrity. Do we need career politicians even on this level? Will the people that we elect do what is best for their friends and contributors or what is best for the residents, taxpayers and citizens of our City?

Downtown Parking Needs & Reommendations

Posted on by

DOWNTOWN PARKING NEEDS & RECOMMENDATIONS

 

Nothing new here! The study verifies what most of us know. It is hard to find a parking spot on Osceola at 8 pm on a Friday night. But not that difficult if you go a block or two away. The consultants have many recommendations that Stuart has or will implement. There should be better use of our tram system. Perhaps an extension of the 3-hour parking rule.

 

A vibrant downtown should be busy. It should encourage multi-modal transportation. There is a bustle that is unmistakable with the vibrancy. Stuart and the businesses of Downtown should promote foot traffic so that visitors walk past stores, window shop and purchase items.

 

Downtown Stuart has about 3 hours of prime time. After 9 pm try to get a meal. The streets are relatively empty. When the Lyric performance ends at 10 there are only a handful of places to get a drink or a late-night snack. Stuart is far from being a late-night destination. And that is fine with most of our residents.

 

Stuart does not need to grow to become another Port Saint Lucie. We do need to act more like a city. We should not have parking wag the dog of Stuart’s future. In Downtown, East Ocean and Colorado, the City should encourage new businesses and residential development. This is where young people should live, work, and have fun. Then when they are ready for their next phase of life, Stuart needs to make sure that homes are available for them to live and raise their families.

 

Micro transit, bike lanes, golf carts are just part of what will give Stuart the needed impetuous to accomplish that. The city of the future will not look like a city of the past. If it does, that city will either be in Disneyworld or be a vacant empty shell.

One More Time

Posted on by

Once again, I am writing about the state of our water and environment.

I am one of many residents of the Treasure Coast concerned with this. Being concerned is not the same as having much of an impact on fixing our water quality and environment. There is not a single person who would say that having toxic algae threaten our quality of life is acceptable.

Some of this is due to development here and some because of agriculture around the lake and along our own canals. Most is for the economic benefit of Central Florida/Orlando with the added complication of the dike, South Florida developments and protection of what’s left of the Everglades.

It does not really matter what I and most residents believe. We are just background noise to the people that do matter in this battle. Big Agriculture and Big Developers are the forces with money and therefore those that pull the strings. These are the individuals and companies who can make or break political careers. They are the kingmakers who can spend millions to put individuals into office. Do you believe they are not looking for something in return?

Money manipulates our politics. It decides who can run for office and be elected. With the demise of political ideology that parties ascribe to in practice if not rhetorically, any party or politician can be used by these forces. They are experts in thwarting solutions if those solutions would prevent them making a buck. This is the state of our politics and elected officials.

Some of this nefarious behavior is subtle while other action is overt. Depending on circumstances, our elected officials attempt to be seen as pro clean water but do nothing to further real solutions to the problem. Competing goals and ideas make it seem as if something is being done, yet the status quo remains.

Whether you call yourself a Republican or Democrat, Liberal or Conservative, we all want clean water and a sustainable environment. The variable to obtain what we want is how much we are willing to do to further that goal. As consumers, are we willing to pay more for the products we buy? As taxpayers, are we willing to pay more for government to clean up the environment? As residents, are we willing to pay more to live on the Treasure Coast, Florida and the United States?

A clean environment requires sacrifices. Are we willing to do what is necessary to have what we want?

NAACP NEWSLETTER

Posted on by

Martin County NAACP (Unit 5085)

               Newsletter and Community Calendar

                                                        P.O. Box 41, Stuart, FL 34995

                                           720 SE Martin Luther King Jr. Blvd., Suite 5

                                                                  Stuart, FL 34994

                                                                   (772) 600-5784

                                                           MartinNAACP@gmail.com

News

Martin County’s first NAACP office opened on 12/02/18.  Call for Office Hours.

Martin County Branch wins Youth Group award at quarterly state meeting.

  Awarded for most participation by a youth group.

 

Membership Committee- Started a Voter Registration and Vote by Mail Initiative.  If your church group or club would like a Voter Registration presentation or a registration package that you can use to present yourself, call the office.

Primary Election Voting: August 28th     Last day to register for General Election: October 9th

Get a sample ballot from our office or the Supervisor of Elections office.

If you are 18 on or before the election date, you may vote.  Voting dates: Aug. 28th and Nov. 6th

 

Please encourage all of your friends and neighbors to vote- it’s your easiest way to exercise your First Amendment right to free speech and your best way to participate in your government.  Keep your ideas in front of our elected officials all year long- that’s your right, too!

Community Calendar

Monthly Meetings– Executive Board Meeting: 1st Thursday of month at 7:00 PM at NAACP office

                                             Community Meeting: 3rd Thursday of month at 7:00 PM – Call for Location

Upcoming Events-

Back to School Bash August 4th from 10:00 AM to 2:00 PM (set-up at 8:00 AM)

Events include haircuts, shots, food bank representatives, school backpacks & supplies.

Let’s Talk Business August 6th, 7:00 PM at NAACP Office

Learn how to set goals to help develop your ideas.

Established business people welcome to share stories of success and provide encouragement.

 

Walk for Unity Reggie D to stop at NAACP Office August 11th, around 2:00 PM

Call for time to meet and walk with Reggie from County Line Road and US 1 to Stuart.

Light food & drinks and tour of Stuart as Reggie D continues on to Seattle, Washington.

August 12th Send-off at 1:00 PM from NAACP Office for 96 day, 3,200 mile journey.

Annual State Conference and Freedom Fund September 6-8, 2018

Caribbean Festival October 6th Port Salerno

Miracle on 10th Street   December 8th, 10:00 AM – 3 PM, 10th St. Rec Center

            Need Toy Donations and Sponsors