Governmental Boards Need to Know Their Limits

I’ve noticed a troubling trend with our local governments. It is that members do not understand the scope, mission and authority of the boards, councils and commissions they serve on. The reason it is troubling is that, when the individual members don’t perform within the boundaries of their statutory authority, citizens may not get a fair hearing. Whether appointed or elected to boards, individuals must understand the scope of their authority and the purpose the board was created.

At the last meeting of the Zoning and Appeals Board in Stuart, a matter came before it that had to do with a lot split into two single-family home lots. Once split the lots would not conform with the existing code. The owner of the new homes intends to lease them once they are built. The controversy for some neighbors was that the new homes would have rear buildings. They feared they would be rented as apartments thus creating a four-family multiple dwelling. There is no Stuart ordinance preventing the rental of homes. The applicant and staff had already added language to the development order that would make it, if not impossible, harder to rent those back buildings as individual units. If they were, it would be a matter for Code Enforcement and, ultimately, a Magistrate.

While most of the discussion was about this fear of rental and of ancillary units, it should have been immaterial to the Board’s decision. Their responsibility is not whether those units would be rented but whether the lot split was justified under the regulations. The zoning of that lot is for a single-family home. By splitting the lot that has the right to have a single-family home, you are creating two lots that will be non-conforming.

It is not within the Board’s authority to decide whether rental units are being created. The structures being built are within code. The important matter before the Board was whether by not granting the lot split would there be a hardship. I contend that the answer is no, there is no hardship. A perfectly adequate single-family home could be constructed on the existing lot without splitting it into two lots to create two homes.

A “hardship” is not defined as an inability to maximize an investment. Otherwise every lot in Stuart could have an apartment house or office building on it. A “hardship” would be, if the entire original lot would have been only 56 feet wide, while a 60 feet wide minimum was necessary. In that case, then a home would not have been able to be built and a variance would be needed. In that instance it should be granted.

In this case, the Board has exceeded its authority. I agree that this type of housing with ancillary units are desirable for the City. The way to achieve this would be for staff to write a change in the code to allow these units and the City Commission could then vote in favor of doing so. By the Zoning and Appeals Board doing this in an ad hoc manner, it creates the necessity for every property owner to make an appeal in order to have the same outcome.

While the Board may have acted improperly in this case, I don’t believe it was done maliciously or intentionally. What happens is that board members, including commissioners, do not receive the necessary training to fulfill their duties. Education by staff and outside facilitators should be continuous and ongoing. Every meeting should have an agenda item to help in accomplishing just this. When you serve on a board it is more than just showing up. Too bad citizens don’t insist that this occurs.

Why Not Charters For All?

Florida, as with so much of the rest of the U.S., doesn’t know what it wants its educational system to be. Should it be one that stresses “the 3 Rs” or concentrates on STEM subjects. Some would want it to provide a classical education with the study of Cicero by reading the original text in Latin and Plato in Greek. Each of the above has merit.

What many parents, school boards and teachers believe is that there is far too much testing and not enough emphasis on a well-rounded education. The phrase “teaching to the test” is in almost every conversation that we have regarding our schools. Even with the continuous testing, the U.S. still ranked 31 out of 35 for OECD (The Organisation for Economic Development and Cooperation) nations. These numbers are abysmal. Nationally, Florida ranks 29th. So, when we hear that Martin County is number 2 or 3 in the state, that doesn’t give me much cause for joy.

It appears that, as a nation and state, we can’t agree on how and in what subjects our children should be educated. We ask our school systems to come up with a curriculum that will please everyone from the “flat earthers” to those that want quantum physics. Like everything else in America today, we all have our “alternate facts” when discussing public education. In fact, we can’t even decide on the definition of a public school.

Years ago, there were two types of schools — public and private. Most private schools were religion based. There was no such thing as “home schooling.” Parents chose to pay extra to send their children to private school if they thought it was a better education. Today we expect some of our private schools to be publicly supported and we give them the name of Charter Schools.

It may be time that the state declares all schools to be Charter Schools. Let parents decide where to send their children to school, not just based on geography. By use of vouchers, this can become a reality. This approach has been tried in New Orleans with success. There are still academic standards for students to meet. And the state must be ruthless in closing those schools that constantly fail. The state becomes a regulator instead of a provider of education.

This may seem radical, but I know one thing for certain, the present model is not working. It is a failure that is giving our children, at best, a mediocre education. By continuing on the same educational path, we will become less and less competitive in the world. My grandfather, who was an immigrant to America and had at best a rudimentary formal education, could read and speak three languages. My father, who never went to college, could quote St. Augustine, Socrates and recite poetic verse, all of which he learned in school. Can our children do the same?

Godot & The Commission

The Stuart City Commission has become a re-active body instead of pro-active one. What I mean by that statement is that the Commission is not looking to shape the City’s future.  By simply waiting for something to happen, the City stagnates instead of progressing. Any growth becomes an amalgam of disparate projects without any theme. Without planning for the future, a cohesive vision is not accomplished. So, the Commission does nothing and waits. But what are they waiting for?

This is the 65th anniversary of Samuel Beckett’s play, Waiting for Godot. The two main characters, Vladimir and Estragon are waiting for Godot to make an appearance. They inhabit a nihilistic world of gloom. Both Estragon and Vladimir keep saying that they will leave but then they wait because they believe Godot will come — but always tomorrow.

The City of Stuart is more than a decade older than Martin County. When the County was formed, Stuart was where the overwhelming majority of the people lived, worked and shopped. Nearly a century later the County has grown exponentially but not the City. The City’s population is a little over 10% of Martin County’s total population today. The amount of sales tax revenue, gas tax revenue and other appropriations the City receives are based on that proportionately diminished base. Yet, like Vladimir, the City Commission waits.

Pineland Prairie will probably be approved by the County to develop in Palm City. It is a good project. Once fully built out it will have more residents than the City of Stuart. It comprises thousands of acres, yet the plan calls for cluster development. In effect, it will create a city surrounded by open land. Pineland Prairie is innovative. Yet, like Estragon, the City Commision waits.

Our City Commission is averse to workshops on planning for the City’s future. For the last year that I was on the Commission, I worked with staff to have neighborhood meetings to find out what residents thought was important. Unfortunately, the City Manager decided that he didn’t want to know what was on the minds of the people of Stuart. So now Stuart waits.

Stuart’s Godot may come and give the Commission guidance. The present City Commission won’t find a plan on its own. So, the Commission waits. While Vladimir and Estragon waited, they spoke to each other. The City Commission doesn’t do even that. The play’s characters cared about what Godot would say when he appeared. I don’t believe this current City Commission cares at all.

The Press & Local Government

Martin County has a problem. While there are large financial and procedural problems both within the City and County governments, what I am concerned about is much more fundamental. It is simply a lack of press coverage on what those governments are actually doing. Without unbiased reporting, citizens have no idea what their governments are doing in their names.

How can citizens possibly be able to keep tabs on their elected officials if they have no idea what is going on? Sure, we have public meetings, but public meetings do no good if the public has no knowledge of what goes on in those meetings. While at least the City of Stuart’s meetings are held in the evening, Martin County Commission meetings are strictly held in the daytime, precluding most people with a job from attending.

The City’s meetings are streamed and can also be watched later online while the County’s meetings can be seen on MC-20. This is not as helpful as it may seem. What I have discovered is that the best way to keep something secret is to give people too much information without context. Until recent years, that context was provided by the local press.  Our current local press corps has failed us miserably in this respect.

While we have very talented opinion writers in the local newspaper, they are not reporters. They give us their opinions with a certain slant. It is valuable and good reading, but it is not a substitute for the good old-fashioned reporting of “who, what, when, where and why” when writing a news story to inform the public. TV journalism is not relevant in Martin County unless it is to report the sensational. Radio has no news component in local reporting at all.

I can’t blame TC Palm/Treasure Coast Newspapers or any television station for no longer being journalistic in the traditional sense. Perhaps it is too much to ask for any one news source to inform the public. The public has turned away from these conventional sources and want their news from social media. But social media has its limitations for a number of reasons, including the lack of verification of the facts.

I have painted a grim picture. But all the “Sunshine” in the world doesn’t help if no one is watching what government is doing. We have become an electorate of opinions absent the facts. It is a place where our prejudices and suppositions cloud our informed decision-making.  So, we re-elect incumbents without knowing their actual records and votes.

This is ultimately not good for local self-government nor for our democracy. As Thomas Jefferson wrote in a letter to Charles Yancey in 1816:

“If a nation expects to be ignorant and free, in a state of civilization, it expects what never was and never will be. The functionaries of every government have propensities to command at will the liberty and property of their constituents. There is no safe deposit for these but with the people themselves; nor can they be safe with them without information. Where the press is free, and every man able to read, all is safe.”

 

Citizen Apathy

So, another week has passed. FBI probes, indictments, mass shootings and sex and infidelity scandals are what greet us morning, noon and night. Our government in Washington can’t seem to pass legislation. Our President can’t stop the tweets. And Tallahassee is trying to run every Floridian’s life in the name of giving the individual freedom. This is the state of the nation.

Being a citizen means more than just coming to the polls and voting at election time. Throughout their terms, elected officials need to have citizen participation on an ongoing basis. As one of those elected officials, I need that input to do my job. Residents, taxpayers and voters must be active and informed for our system of government to work.

When I am on the dais, I will always see City staff in the audience. There will be lawyers and planners representing applicants waiting their turn before the Commission. Perhaps a neighbor or two that may be affected by the proposed projects. And, as usual, two or three citizens, the same citizens that attend meeting after meeting. This is not acceptable. In order to make sure that our Commission acts for the benefit of the entire City, more residents need to know what is going on.

We need citizens to be there even when a project will not directly affect them. We need citizens to be there to make sure that a “favored” friend is not voted an undue advantage. We need citizens there to make sure that nothing is slipped by without, at the least, a voice to sound the alarm and remember. We need citizens because otherwise we will have a government that is not accountable to the people.

It is true that the farther government is from the people the less responsive it is to the people. Congress and the Legislature know that and that is why they have made government less and less accountable by taking away or pre-empting local control. But even local government only stays accountable by having citizens involved. You can’t be in Washington or Tallahassee on a weekly basis. You can be at City Hall.

Little Corruptions

On Thursday, February 15th another school massacre occurred. A deranged kid with a gun took 17 lives. The dead were school children and teachers. Most of those lives were extinguished before they had begun.

We have grown accustomed to these incidents. The playbook has been written. There will be tinges of sadness followed by outrage then the political hyperbole about gun control. We will hear that this is not the time to discuss what to do while relatives and loved ones are grieving. And, of course, that old chestnut of “If there were more good people with guns…” There is always an excuse but never any concrete action to curb the violence.

So much of how America operates is dysfunctional. We are a selfish society polarized by politics and inflamed by people with ulterior motives. All of which occurs for the enrichment of the few at the expense of the many. We have become a country that is corrupt. We have not yet become a nation where bribes are expected in order to have our telephones installed. Rather we are more and more morally corrupted by our elites playing on our emotions and beliefs for their own sinister purposes.

Nothing is accomplished by our government of any substance. The perception is now more important than the actual reality. As a society we no longer believe it is wrong that the playing field is not fair. It is alright for those who know the right people to benefit at the public expense. Those very few now manipulate government on all levels for their benefit. The majority no longer counts except as backdrop.

From our educational system to our political system to our financial system, it is now all rigged to enhance those fortunate few. They have cynically taken over the levers of power as their own. They use any means necessary to enhance their positions. They have no core beliefs or principles. There is only the pursuit of power and riches.

So the little corruptions continue. Rational thought and the art of compromise no longer matter in the nation’s public life and is true in our personal ones as well. We believe some of the lies told and shut our eyes and pretend that we do for the rest. This is the America we inhabit where truths are far from self-evident and government is not for all the people.

In the not too distant past, America’s politicians and leaders would never have stood by while these massacres happened. A common sense for the common good would have prevailed. But not today! No, in the name of power and greed Americans, especially our youngest, will continue to die. It is more important that the connected few keep the false feuds going between the American people in the name of political discourse. Then those connected can amass even more money and power. These little corruptions are eating away at the fiber of our nation and ultimately will destroy it.

 

 

Where Is Stuart?

One of my pet peeves is the number of people that state they live in Stuart when, in actuality, their homes are located in unincorporated Martin County. People living outside the City send emails complaining about something or expressing an opinion regarding an agenda item. What they fail to realize is that they do not vote in the City of Stuart, they do not own property or a business within Stuart, nor do they pay taxes to the City. Yet they believe they should have a say in how Stuart residents govern themselves.

Why is there such a desire by so many non-residents to consider themselves part of our municipal family? The first reason is many have moved to Martin County from somewhere else. Many of Martin County’s new residents originally found us because they vacationed here, or friends and relatives are already living here. Naturally to most of these people, whether they are on Hutchinson Island or in Port Salerno, it is all Stuart. Another reason is because the newspapers and TV stations identify stories as happening within Stuart when identifying the location as Jensen Beach or Rio would be more appropriate.

The third reason is that people don’t quite understand the governmental relationships between Martin County and Stuart. In other parts of the country, counties are not as consequential as towns, cities and villages. School districts are not county-based but could be part of a municipality or an independent district within a municipality. In the New England area, for example, governmental decisions are made at the town level. Counties have very few governmental responsibilities.

The last reason is probably the most prevalent. Martin County grew up around Stuart. The area even beyond the incorporation boundaries became known as Stuart. People became used to saying they lived there even if they lived outside the incorporated area by a street, or even miles. Until relatively recently if you needed to buy something in Martin County, you came to Stuart. If you wanted to eat in a restaurant or go to the movies, you came to the City. That, of course, is no longer true as Martin County has grown exponentially compared to Stuart.

With all that said, as a Stuart City Commissioner, I must remember who I do represent. While the thoughts and opinions of other Martin County residents may be relevant in some cases, I owe my allegiance to those who live within Stuart’s boundaries. As a Commissioner, it is my responsibility to do what’s right for my constituents — the citizens of the City of Stuart.

I Hate Florida East Coast Railroad!

I hate Florida East Coast Railroad and Brightline. For longer than I have been elected, I have been fighting the coming passenger trains. I missed the CARE meeting last night at the Lyric because I was in Tallahassee for the Florida League of Cities. I applaud their action. I applaud Martin County’s continuing fight against this atrocity for all of the county’s residents. I continue to hate Florida East Coast Railroad and Brightline.

The scheme to run high speed trains along a densely populated corridor is insane. Nowhere else in the world would this be accepted. The cities and towns along the tracks are being asked to tolerate the intolerable. Our citizens are being told to sacrifice their quality of life for the profits of a private company. That private company falls back on 19th century federal law for their right to disrupt the wellbeing of millions of people. Everyday autonomous trucks and cars are closer to reality and yet we must accept the “iron horse” as a modern way for people and freight to be moved.

There is a bill going through the Florida Legislature which would mitigate some of the effects of the promised endless trains. I will be speaking to the sponsors today to thank them for their efforts. I don’t know if it will pass and be signed into law by our Governor? And, if so, will the courts uphold it because of the federal supremacy laws? That’s a good question. I am afraid that, no matter what happens, Martin County and Stuart will have to learn to live with the unimaginable.

I do believe somewhere and sometime along these tracks a train will derail leaking either chemicals or compressed gas, causing immeasurable harm. I believe there will be politicians screaming and saying to ban the train, but the train will continue. I believe that people will continue to be hit by speeding trains and die. I believe that the people of the Treasure Coast will be ignored for the sake of corporate interests.

With all that said, I also believe that we must look at what we can do to mitigate the railroad’s effect on our citizens. We must look at “Quiet Zones” so that our residents will not sacrifice all their quality of life. There is an argument to be made that, without the horns, people will not know that trains are coming. But there is something known as personal responsibility. Cars should not ignore gates being down and lights flashing. People should not be taking a shortcut by walking along the tracks.

Is any of this ideal? The answer, of course, is no. That doesn’t mean we don’t look at “Quiet Zones” and their costs. It is easy to bury our heads in the sand. It is politically more acceptable to not seek out less-than-optimal solutions. I want us to continue the fight in the courts and through Congress and the Legislature. I just want us to make sure we look at every option to ensure our residents and taxpayers have the best quality of life.

How Far Should Individual Rights Go!

During the years I have been travelling to Tallahassee, I have spoken to many legislators in pursuit of advocating for municipal self-determination. One of the by-products of these meetings is receiving various legislator newsletters. One newsletter I receive is from Senator Greg Steube. Senator Steube is the ultimate property rights advocate — to such an extent that he wants to prevent any regulation by local government of the trees on your property. Another of his bills would prevent regulation of short-term vacation rentals.

In many ways I agree with Senator Steube’s philosophy of private property rights. You should be able to do what you want with your property. However, there is no right that is absolute. We need to remember that what you do on your property does affect your neighbor. So the question really becomes how much the government should regulate an individual’s behavior and actions.

If you live on a 400-acre farm, should you be able to have a garbage pit to throw your trash into? Should you be allowed to dam the stream that runs through your property to create a lake? In a more urban setting, should you have the right to rent out your home by the day?  Should you need a permit to cut down a tree?

First let’s take the example of cutting down trees. One of the most contentious items in granting development permission is how many and where trees can be removed. The second part of the equation is, after the developer removes the trees, how many should be replanted and what species. As a society, do we not want to encourage habitat for birds and other wildlife within our communities? Since most of us in cites live in very close proximity to our neighbors, how every home and yard is maintained has a direct economic and aesthetic impact on other property owners.

Vacation rentals can pose problems. If I move into a residential single family neighborhood and the owners of the house next door begin renting their dwelling out on a daily or weekly basis, doesn’t that have an impact on my rights? If I wanted to live in a more commercial setting, I would have chosen a different place to call home. We have zoning to prevent just such problems. Hotels must follow certain building and health codes for the protection of their guests and public. What about the tax money that is lost to jurisdictions?

It has been my experience that local government doesn’t regulate just to regulate. There usually is broad support for the ordinances they enact. Tallahassee should not concern itself so much with what cities and towns do but rather with statewide problems. Senator Steube is not only a state senator but a citizen of a local jurisdiction. He has the same rights as any citizen to petition his local elected officials to change the local ordinances that he does not like. If enough of the local electorate agrees, it will be accomplished.

What he or any state legislator shouldn’t do is use their authority to circumvent Florida citizens’ local self-determination. If enough voters of a municipality want to change something then they can elect others in the next election that agree with their position. Unfortunately, Senator Steube and other legislators believe that Tallahassee should be the arbiter of what we do locally and not you, the people who actually live, pay taxes and vote within your communities.

What Is the Indian River Lagoon & Council

I attended a meeting of the Indian River Lagoon Council Management Board this past week. As the representative of the Treasure Coast Regional League of Cities, my purpose for being appointed is to give the other board members the perspective of our cities.  What you quickly discover is that the problems of our Indian River Lagoon are not restricted to Stuart, Martin County or even the Treasure Coast. The estuary encompasses five counties and two water management districts. Each of those areas has its own set of challenges which affect the water quality in everyone’s areas.

The Indian River Lagoon (IRL) has three main bodies of water: Mosquito Lagoon, Banana River and the Indian River Lagoon. There are no true rivers because there are no headwaters and no mouths, such as the Mississippi River has. The IRL is an estuary and that is why it is part of the National Estuary Program.  The Council is a federal program under the supervision of the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and is funded by Congress.

Through the IRL grants program, local governments and other organizations can participate in an RFP process to secure funding for water quality projects. This is an additional source for money besides going to the Florida Legislature. The Indian River Lagoon Council is a resource that should be used in our fight for our Florida waterways.

As I have repeatedly said and written, there is no one magic solution to Florida’s water quality problems. It took over a hundred years of neglect, ignorance and, in some instances, downright skullduggery to create this problem. We will need another century and billions of dollars to correct it. One water farm or reservoir or sewer system is only one piece of the puzzle in this ongoing fight.

So I will continue to make what contribution I can in this area, both as an elected official and resident of the area. Unfortunately, this should be looked on as a multi-generational struggle. I am not going to blame or demonize one industry or interest group.  That would be counter-productive to achieving the goal. It took all of us, either through greed or ignorance, to harm our estuary. It will take everyone to help in its transformation into what we want it to be.