Who Interprets Development Orders?

No matter how small a development project that is presented before the Commission or an advisory board, there are conditions for approval usually attached. Who is responsible for making sure those conditions are fulfilled before the project ultimately obtains its certificate of occupancy?

 

Rightfully, the elected body assumes that the developer or builder will abide by those terms. When the final inspection is made to make sure the building code has been complied with, does anyone at the City or County look to see whether those other conditions were met? And if not, then why not? Who is guarding the hen house so to speak?

 

We must keep in mind that we have several different codes. Zoning and Land Development Regulations (LDR) are the ones that the Development Department and the Boards and Commissions create and administer within the parameters allowed by state law. The Building Official is responsible for making sure that Florida’s Building Codes are followed by the builder.

 

Even if the Commission wanted to, it could not alter the Florida Building Code. A Commissioner cannot tell his friend to forget about the sprinkler system if the Building Code requires it. What a Commission can do is give the developer 3 units more than would be allowed under the LDR.  They could change the zoning on the property from one use to the other to make the project move forward.

 

When the Commission does those things, it usually will require other changes in the developer’s plan. For example, it could require a second means of egress, more plantings to block the project from someone’s view or to have 8-foot sidewalks instead of 6 feet. It is a negotiation between both parties.

 

Supposedly, a certificate of occupancy is given after all the conditions of the plan approval are met. Sometimes, they simply are not. Other times, conditions could be open to interpretation. And, let us face it, the appointed and elected officials are no match for the expertise of staff. It is staff that does the interpretation.

 

I do not know what the answer is, but mostly the public loses in this battle of wits and wordsmithing. For the most part, elected bodies try to do the right thing. That is why they weigh the interests of all their constituents, the immediate neighbors, and the property owner. Ultimately, it is how staff interprets those compromises which are memorialized in development conditions that are so important.

 

Project approval is only the beginning of the process. The public needs to be aware of how that order is understood by staff. They are the ones that have the final authority. It may be up to you to make sure the order is interpreted as the Commission meant it to apply, and if not, bring it to their attention.

Booze Expands In Downtown Stuart

Martin County and Stuart are taking baby steps in reopening. Downtown was especially hard hit in the past weeks when businesses were closed due to the pandemic. The City and the downtown business owners have taken great strides over the past 30 years to make the area a destination spot that drew visitors from literally the entire United States.

 

By writing an innovative code that allowed for individual “mom & pop” stores to thrive, the City showed that downtown would be revived and not turn into an outdoor mall with chain stores and too many bars and restaurants. This may now be in jeopardy because of the City government not following its own code.

 

The plan that was initiated for the downtown’s rebirth had mainly two ideas. The first was to limit chains by using design standards. In many instances, this precluded a Talbot’s, for instance, from renting space. This preserved the small-town charm and unique characteristics that have encouraged tourists and others venturing here to have a great experience.

 

The other part of the plan was to limit the sale of alcoholic beverages to not more than 30% of the downtown area. In that way, Stuart would not become a miniature Clematis Street or Delray Beach. Bars and restaurants can afford to pay higher rents. If allowed to multiply, those quaint boutiques would soon be out of business because they would be unable to compete.

 

Both have been instrumental in creating the downtown we have today. Now that is being threatened by either the City Development Office not knowing its own code or willful defiant actions of that code. A business expansion in one case and the signing of a new lease in another will place the City in an untenable situation.

 

The Black Marlin is expanding (with permits) into the Cigar store that was next to it, and Development has allowed the Cigar store to sign a lease in a new space knowing that its plan is to sell alcohol. Those two actions will result in over 30% of the downtown area selling booze in one form or another.

 

It is astounding to me that this could occur. Only the Commission can change an ordinance…not staff. Yet, here is Stuart with two businesses that have spent a substantial amount of money to expand with staff ignoring the 30% rule. What are the next steps?

 

In all probability, the Commission will retroactively allow for these exceptions to avoid possible litigation. The staff will beg forgiveness if pushed, but the Commission may never even know why they are saying yes to the doing away of the 30% rule. Staff is good at the mumble jumble of bureaucratize.

 

There were good reasons why that rule was placed in effect. Maybe it should be changed after discussion and input. That is not the point here. Staff does not make policy. The Commission does.

 

If staff did not know its own code, that is a real problem. If staff ignored the code because they thought they knew best, that is an even bigger problem.

 

A few years ago, this issue came up when the restaurant in the Arcade Building was being refurbished and expanded. Then before going forward, it was vetted by different interest groups such as Downtown Business Association and Stuart Main Street. A solution was found, and there was substantial public input into that result. There has been no input this time.

 

With all the speeches about transparency and involving the people, it seems to me that the City (or least some of the staff) has decided that it finds the citizens, and maybe even the Commissioners, superfluous. This is the bureaucratic boondoggle that citizens complain about.

 

I hope the Commission pushes back. It would be great if downtown boutiques did so. At the very least, citizens have a right to know who is in charge and why this and other similar things have happened recently.  By ignoring what has worked well in maintaining Stuart’s small-town charm, while remaining a destination, we may find ourselves a different place.

The Shape Of Things To Come?

At some point, Stuart and Martin County will begin to reopen. Much of how we react to the lifting of restrictions will depend on when it occurs, what are the phases, and how others behave.

 

Governor DeSantis will need to be clear on what he is intending to do and accomplish. That will mean his orders will have to be written so that Floridians will clearly understand them. He will have to give some discretion to local governments to tailor his orders to local needs and sensibilities.

 

The ultimate arbiter of what happens will be the collective responses of individuals. Before the shutdown, we all had our own routines. For me, going back to mine will be different than for you going back to your routine. Even when everything opens, will people immediately resume their old patterns?

 

Some of us will not be returning to crowded golf courses at first. Others will be circumspect about frolicking on the beach or hitting balls at the tennis courts. Many, on the other hand, may be back golfing, swimming, and hitting balls as soon as possible. How many though will resume those activities with a little trepidation?

 

Before the time of corona, many of us would go out to lunch several times a week with others. Breaking bead with a person leads to a rapport that you cannot get any other way. This activity may resume very slowly. Going forward will we think this social and intimate lunch could be a breeding ground for the spread of the virus.

 

Two months ago, my wife and I would go out to dinner once or twice per week. Since the lock down that has been a thing of the past. The restaurant experience of being served by a competent professional who makes customers welcome is a big part of the charm. It was special as opposed to sitting at the kitchen table. Will we feel the same if the server is in gloves and mask?

 

Many enjoyed having friends over for dinner at our homes. Like many I would hope at some point to resume that. Every time there is a sneeze, or a cough will a little apprehension be felt at the table.

 

Except for our forays out for grocery shopping, many have kept close to home. My car has not needed a fill up for a month, and I still have more than half a tank. If you enjoyed travelling pre-pandemic how many have had to cancel plans?

 

I would go up north for business and to see family regularly. Sometimes, I flew twice a month to New York City. I treated JetBlue as a commuter line. I have not taken a flight since March 7th. And while I miss the family, I do not think I will be travelling as much for business going forward.

 

Other things will change for many of us. Will we visit retail stores less?  Have we become a little more use to the convenience of buying online? For many products you can do your shopping while watching television.  Does this drive another nail in mom and pop type stores’ demise?

 

Each of us will adjust our life as restrictions are lifted. I am assuming that as those restrictions are lifted, people will act rationally because the virus is still out there. If restrictions need to be re-imposed, then that will be a blow to our psyches. Open and closing businesses may create insurmountable challenges for many businesses ever being able to reopen after repeated shutdowns. That is just a fact. Confidence is shaky at best.

 

We had riots in the street over the Vietnam War. Over more than a dozen years, U.S. casualties for that conflict were less than 2 months of COVID-19. That experience profoundly changed how my generation saw our government and society. This will probably do the same for millennials and the generation still attending school.

 

This pandemic will have even more of an effect than any occurrence since the Great Depression. Our economy has not even begun to process all the ramifications. How many people will go back to work? How long will it take to achieve less than 3% unemployment again, if ever.

 

Our nation and the world are changed. Things we have taken for granted will be different. The restaurant and hospitality industry will be forever altered. More jobs will be automated so that there will be less human contact. Commercial real estate will undergo a transformation as working from home will become more common and social distancing a new norm.

 

H.G. Wells authored a book in 1933 tilled, The Shape of Things to Come. It is a work of science fiction regarding a pandemic, depression, and eternal war. Though fiction it predicted World War II and the carpet bombing of civilians in cities. What we are living through now many of us would think a year ago could never happen. That we would be protected in our cocoon.

 

Changes will occur because individuals will make decisions based on their experiences with the pandemic. It may take years to know and understand the lasting effects. One of the biggest changes will be that the baby boomers will finally cede power to those of Generation X and the Millennials. They will be the ones deciding what is important in our society and what is not. That is not a bad thing going forward.

MCTV Should Belong To Everyone!

GE Photo

There are 168 hours in a week. 24 hours in a day. 302,400 minutes in the average month. I think it is more than enough available time for MCTV to televise every meeting for every government in the County. In fact, each meeting could be repeated several times. So why isn’t what should be called the tax-payer-funded Martin County Citizens Channel doing so?

 

Much has to do with inertia…county government believing that since they have never done so, why should they do so now could be a prevalent thought. Another possibility is a more parochial one…the channel belongs to the government. In my mind, those are lame excuses. The County should do it because it is in the public’s interest to know what their governments are doing in their names. That was the concept of having government channels when franchise agreements with providers were signed in accordance with Section 611 of the Communications Act.

 

It is amazing how many people tune in to watch meetings. It is more than I would ever have expected. Not everyone can go to BOCC meetings but almost everyone can watch the re-airing later. Many of us do.

 

What has really brought this to the forefront is the shutting down of public meetings in the time of COVID-19. Different boards have tried and done their best, but it has resulted in limited public input. The “public square” has been cordoned off. Zoom has been used in the breach, but it is nothing like a real face to face meeting.

 

And when a citizen can’t be there, televised meetings are the next best thing. Body language, which sometimes conveys more than words, helps identify where someone stands on an issue. C-Span has been going strong for the past 40 years showing unedited content of Congress and our national government. There is the Florida Channel which does much the same for Tallahassee. MCTV should serve the same function for Martin County.

 

MCTV production costs are paid for through the County’s General Fund. Whether you live in unincorporated Martin County, Stuart, Indiantown or the other municipalities, every taxpayer is contributing. The intention of the station was never to be the lone mouthpiece to showcase how staff views things. It was to inform the public on all government.

 

There would be added expense for sure. Most of it should be borne by the general fund and some by the governmental entities based on population. Currently, the only other governmental entity that broadcasts a meeting is the School Board. That meeting is not shown live but rather a couple of days later. I would imagine that is because closed captioning must be inserted.

 

The School Board is charged a premium. It is against the concept of sunshine and open government.

 

The station should operate much as C-Span does and not as a propaganda arm of Martin County government. Today, we have the capability of making sure that citizens have the knowledge of what is being done in their names, televised meetings are as much a part of government as other departments.

 

The County Commission should get behind this effort and spearhead it. The other governments and their boards should also be lobbying to see this occur. I hear from many board members that they are committed to transparency. Having televised government meetings for every board in Martin County would be a way to show their commitment to that principle.

Children, Height and Stuart

Recently, Stuart has apparently offended several communities on its municipal borders.

 

In both instances, developers have proposals to build multi-family projects on vacant land. Both are located on major thoroughfares. What they are attempting to do is bring new housing to the City that actually looks like it belongs in an urban setting. It’s the kind of housing everyone claims we need until it is next to your home.

 

The first is on East Ocean Blvd nestled next to Kingswood which is in the City. Kingswood is an over age 55 community. Their residents are apparently deathly afraid of having families with children living next to them. At the last LPA meeting on February 20, Kingswood resident after resident voiced concerns regarding the proximity that they would have to the greatest evil they can imagine which, apparently, are kids.

 

Perhaps this is an outgrowth of an increasingly selfish society. Just imagine if these same individuals were objecting to new neighbors based on race, ethnicity, religion, or a myriad of other unacceptable reasons. How about if a developer wanted to build an over-55 community in the middle of a family neighborhood, and the kids objected to grandma and grandpa moving in.

 

The second project is fronting Federal Highway off Harrison Street in South Stuart. The developer wants to build 7 four-story buildings on 13.9 acres consisting of 280 apartments with amenities. There are single family homes in a development known as Springtree surrounding the proposed site to the rear. They are objecting because of traffic, density and the height of the buildings. At least they are not worried about the characteristics of the new occupants.

 

Humans are programmed to hate change. Change to our daily routine. Change to our diet. And definitely change to our surroundings. If it was a vacant piece of land when we moved here, then it should remain as such even though the current location of my house or condo was once a vacant piece of real estate.

 

If you live within the City of Stuart, on its borders or within the Urban Services Boundary, those vacant lots next to you are going to be developed at some point in the near or far future. Those strip centers that are now nearly empty are going to be re-purposed or demolished to make way for something new and probably bigger.

 

You cannot claim to care about our waterways and then object when vacant land in cities, CRAs, and within the Urban Services Boundary are built upon. The alternative is sprawl. The alternative is more and more congestion on our roadways. The alternative is more concrete and less open space in the western part of the county.

 

Single family homes are expensive to build and then to own. Realistically, fewer and fewer of us can afford or want to live in these homes. During the Springtree presentation at the City, a picture was shown of a four-story condo, The Edgewater, on St Lucie Crescent in Stuart which also happens to be my neighborhood.

 

This condominium is surrounded by townhouses, single-family homes, rental apartment buildings, and an office building. My mother-in-law lived at that building for thirty years. My wife and I had an apartment there as our Stuart home for 10 years. For the past 15 years, we have lived in a single-family home that we built less than 500 feet from that building. There are no setbacks or trees to hide the site and certainly not a 350-foot preserve and 50-foot additional planted setback as is planned for the development near Springtree. It is a cohesive, friendly, diverse neighborhood where everyone, for the most part, gets along with each other.

 

There really is no sustainable path forward if we continue with the Florida sprawl. Young people can’t afford to spend $500,000 to buy a home. Most people can’t afford those prices. Slowly, we are pricing ourselves out of affordable, workforce, and middle-income housing in Martin County. This is the legacy of NIMBY. Most Martin residents’ visions are nothing should be built, but if something does have to be, make it a single-family sprawl development. Oh, and no children or neighbors, please.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

FOR WHOM DO YOU PULL THE LEVER

When we go to the polls, we make choices. The hardest ones are not about whether a Democrat or a Republican is the better choice. To me, the most perplexing votes are when I am asked to choose between a candidate that has government experience and one that does not.

 

How much does experience matter in elective office? I think it depends on what type of position we are voting to elect. Like any new job, once elected there is a learning curve if you have never worked or served in government before. Government does not operate as the private sector does.

 

Government shouldn’t work as a private business because public money is being expended. There needs to be more safeguards and more hoops to jump through. Bureaucracy is created to do just that.

 

I am more than willing to vote for an inexperienced person to represent me in local government or in the state legislature. Most people who initially run for these positions have the best interests of their communities as their reasons for running. There are seasoned staff employees to explain the intricacies of government to them once elected.

 

I am quite leery of voting for someone with no public track record for an executive office. There is a big difference between “shaking things up” and destroying the system, and knowing the difference is much harder for a neophyte.

 

You need to have the ability to do two things in an executive position.The first is to be able to take advice. The elected executive must be a confident enough leader to surround himself with the very best people he can find. The second is to know your own strengths and weaknesses. Any individual that has been successful has an ego. You need to know how to keep it in check.

 

The last type of elected official is the technical position such as Clerk of the Court, Tax Collector, Sheriff or Property Appraiser. In most places, these positions are not elected ones. Except for sheriff, these are departments within other governments. Those department heads are appointed. They are apolitical and technocratic.

 

Florida has a long tradition of electing these officials. We also had a long tradition of electing our school superintendents. Other places elect chief executives to run local government. We don’t do that here. Is one way better than the other?

 

For those technical offices, the person I vote for must have experience in the field. By running, they are applying for a job and I am one of the deciders on whom to hire. These positions are important. I don’t want my sheriff to be the guy that was an accountant before he was elected.

 

If we are going to insist that we choose a person to run a technical department of government by popular vote, we need to look at his/her resume. You need to have both relevant technical knowledge as well as executive experience. If you make the campaign a popularity contest instead of a job interview, you may not get the best person in that job.

 

Depending on the position, a voter can take different factors into consideration. For county commission, experience isn’t as important as judgement. A connection with the voter is important. A county commissioner or a state senator is a representative of the people that elected him.

 

A sheriff or other constitutional officers are technocrats that enforce existing statutes. They need to have executive experience and knowledge in the field we are entrusting them with overseeing. Electing someone without those attributes is bad public policy and ultimately bad for the taxpayer.

 

Local Government & Affordable Housing

The Stuart City Commission will have a workshop devoted to the topic of housing next week.

 

I hope the Commission does not meander down a predictable path. Will that old chestnut of what to do about affordable housing be brought up? If it is then the entire workshop will be for naught.

 

For some very basic reasons, the City has little it can do to provide more of that type of housing. The physical size of the City is limited. The amount of property available to erect new buildings is minuscule. Florida’s building code, which is a very good one, results in a more expensive product than 20 years ago. The City itself does not have the funds to subsidize rents. While the City’s impact fees can be lessened a bit, those of the County and School Board can add thousands of dollars to the cost of new development.

 

What the City can do is change its zoning and LDRs especially in the urban downtown area and, more broadly, within most of the CRA. One change could be to eliminate new individual townhouses and single-family homes in those areas. That may seem radical to some, but more and more municipalities and states are taking that approach. In the rest of Stuart, all new construction (including for single-family homes) would be required to have an ancillary apartment. There would be no requirement that it be rented. Over time, small units would be available even if only for resident’s children to occupy while starting out.

 

Another change could be to stop basing decisions on the outmoded concept of density. Stuart has setback and height restrictions which guide the overall building measurement within the parcel’s envelope. Counting the number of units that a project can have is senseless. If the code allows a property owner to build 15 units per acre, it currently does not dictate whether those units are studios, one bedroom, or three bedrooms. The density calculation, then, is meaningless. Common sense dictates there will be more people occupying a three-bedroom unit than a one bedroom.

 

Within the downtown area, and the CRA in general, we should stop requiring so many parking spaces per unit. This artificially limits the number of housing units than can be built. The market will determine what amenities are needed to sell or rent a unit. Parking is an amenity. If a buyer or tenant considers it important, then the developer will have that cost and use in his determination of price just as he does granite counter tops or a powder room.

 

There is a misconception in Stuart that there is no affordable housing. If that were true, then why do more than 60% of dwellings within the City pay no real estate tax and only a small fire fee? If an owner pays no tax, then the cost of his property is quite low.

 

Presently, much of the City’s housing stock is considered obsolete. It is old and has lived its useful life. You can buy units for $100,000. This is about as affordable as it gets. It is true those units need work. But mortgages and carrying charges can be $1000.00 a month.

 

Stuart needs to encourage housing period. Supply will quell demand. New units make older units cheaper.

 

There will still be people who will never find units they can afford. This is an American societal problem rather than a Martin County or Stuart problem. The national and state governments need to address this. Localities will never have the funds to build enough units to satisfy this demand.

 

And lastly, the Commission should not be influenced by people who do not live within Stuart’s boundaries. They may have the best intentions, but their input is secondary to that of the people paying taxes, and I do mean paying taxes to the City. There will always be those who will say I can’t find anything to buy or rent within the City. What they really mean to say is that they can’t find a single-family home or apartment with four bedrooms, a pool, new baths, and new kitchen appliances on an acre of property for $275,000 or $1000 per month rent.

 

Caught In The Past

Millions of people visit Colonial Williamsburg each year. I first went there when I was nine or ten and fell in love with the place.

I can trace my love of early American history to that visit. I took my own children there several times. The last time I was there was a decade ago, and I still enjoyed the experience. I noticed they were playing the same film on their informational television station that I had watched as a kid almost 60 years ago.

Nearby Jamestown, settled in 1607, was the first permanent English settlement in North America. It remained the capital of Virginia until the statehouse burned in 1698. The College of William & Mary and other residents of what was then known as the Middle Plantation asked that the capital be moved there.

The Middle Plantation was renamed Williamsburg and became the colonial head of government, remaining Virginia’s capital throughout the period. Governor Thomas Jefferson moved the capital to Richmond in 1780 to avoid English attacks and to be more centrally located to the western counties. Williamsburg became nothing more than a college town, and for the 19th and early 20th centuries, it was a sleepy backwater and fell into ruin.

The City of Stuart was settled in the late 19th century and incorporated in 1914, which predates the creation of Martin County by more than a decade. For many years, Stuart was the population and business hub of the area. The railroad connected it to the rest of Florida, and the farming and fishing industries were integral to its growth.

Like Williamsburg after 1780, Stuart in the 1960s and 1970s began to decline into irrelevance because of suburbanization and the growth of alternative shopping options in Martin County. There was no longer a reason for the City to exist. The railroad ceased picking up passengers and the station was torn down. Downtown mom and pop stores were no longer needed with the growth of chains and big box stores.

Stuart fell into a miasmic state. It withered in its past. We weren’t southern enough to be like Faulkner’s fictional Jefferson nor were we cowboy enough to emulate McMurtry’s Anarene, Texas. We were a proud has-been farm town like so many others.

In the 1920s, Williamsburg had W.A.R. Goodwin to spearhead restoration, using the Rockefeller fortune to do so. For the decades since, Colonial Williamsburg recreated a town based on Tidewater life in the 18th century just before the Revolution. People from all over the world flock to experience and learn from the docents in period costume.

Stuart didn’t have Goodwin or Rockefeller, but it did have Peter and Joan Jefferson and a core group of others that began the rebirth of downtown and the historic preservation of many late 19th and early 20th century properties. Unlike Williamsburg, Stuart could not become a museum but needed to embrace commerce for economic survival.

Through the last two decades of the 20th century, Stuart saved its downtown. Retail stores catering to tourists were opened. Most new downtown restaurants were not accessible to the average Stuart resident because of price. Since economics needed to play a role in what was feasible, Stuart became a make-believe charming and historic downtown.

We saved the real estate for posterity but not with any real vitality. We made a small historic village next to City Hall but then, except for the Stuart Feed Store (Museum), they became rented offices. It cost hundreds of thousands of dollars to rescue questionable historical structures for what purpose? They are antiquated offices for politicians.

Martin County and Stuart recoil at any development. No old property should ever be torn down (historic or otherwise) in some people’s minds. The old Stuart High School building is a case in point. There is nothing architecturally unique inside or out. It is just a physically, economically, and functionally obsolete building. Yet it tugs at the heart because so many generations attended high school there. If the Arts Council gets its way, the “sick” property will remain off the tax rolls as its new home. It will not make way for new housing. No new families will be living there.

Are we using the term historic to mean that nothing should be changed? Every building, empty lot or current use must stay the same? In many minds, Martin County should be like an insect caught in a block of amber, frozen in time. We are Brigadoon without the sleep and striving to be Burroughs’ The Land That Time Forgot.

There is a price to pay for inertia. We are seeing it as Cleveland Clinic concentrates on expanding in St. Lucie County. Apparently, there are not enough babies being born to have even one private practice doing it in Martin. The hospital will, at great expense, continue obstetrics for the time being.  Due to the expanding populations to our north and south, we will have less clout in Washington and Tallahassee after the next census as we become even more of an afterthought for electoral districts.

I have heard the word paradise used to describe our area. And that is an apt description if you are a senior like me, or someone that has an inheritance. For young people or families trying to make a living, it isn’t such a paradise. History teaches us that remaining in a cocoon is not beneficial for having a future.

Stuart and Martin County are not Colonial Williamsburg. Our history is similar to thousands of other former farm towns. Most of our architecture is anything but “historic.” An old family photo may be sentimental, but it probably isn’t historic. We should know and treasure our history. That is different from living in the past with a predilection to a no-change future.

 

OCTOBER 27TH FRIENDS & NEIGHBORS

From this weeks edition:

The Pelican Café packed the chamber with supporters. It appeared that the vast majority of speakers in favor were not Stuart residents. Each spoke as though the City should give the Daly family carte blanche. If a low rent and a long lease were not given, the speakers implied that western civilization would come to an end.

 

The rumors of high rises, big box stores or chain restaurants were rampant. None of which have a scintilla of truth. When it was their turn to speak, Matheson and Meier set the record straight. None of the above was true. As the people’s representatives, they were looking out for the taxpayers. While they all acquiesced to the rent, they were firm in not allowing a 20-year lease if the Dalys were inclined to sell the leasehold.

 

A private landlord would, first, not give a term of 20 years and would want to recapture the premises if the leasehold was sold. Any profit should go to the people. It is unreasonable to have a 20-year term unless you need the long lease in order to sell.

 

Here is the language the City wants to put into the lease for the 20-year extension:

To read the entire newsletter go to:

https://documentcloud.adobe.com/link/track?uri=urn%3Aaaid%3Ascds%3AUS%3A462cefb2-cddc-476a-be70-02b5081ddb7a

Or get it delivered to your mailbox by sending your email address to thomasfcampenni@gmail.com

 

Why Do We Ignore How Elected Officials Vote

How many of us have disagreed with the votes of our elected leaders?

I would suspect that each and every one of us has. How often we do and what we do about it is what concerns me. For we often disagree with an elected official’s votes on issues but then decide to cast our vote for that same person at the next election. This is especially true in local elections.

We may do so out of loyalty to a political party. Or because we personally know the person as our next-door neighbor or the person in our pew at church. The personal touch is more important than the votes they render from the dais or chamber even if we disagree.

Why is it that we often vote for people that may seem to espouse our points of view but then, when elected, will do the opposite to what they promised? Politics and governing are two different things. While the elected official knows the difference, those of us who are civilians don’t always realize that fact. Politically, when you run for office, you speak in generalities. As Mario Cuomo used to say, “You campaign in poetry. You govern in prose.”

In Washington and Tallahassee, for the most part, the elected representative has no choice but to vote along party lines if they want campaign funds or to have their bills heard or their projects funded. When it comes to County or City officials, it is just that the average person doesn’t know how their council or commission members actually voted. Yes, it is televised, recorded and available, but how many of us listen, watch, or read the minutes to know what happened at the meeting. Most of us would be surprised by their votes and how different that vote was from their campaign rhetoric.

It is awfully frustrating to know and understand how and why a commissioner voted the way that he/she did. We have so very much to do in our own daily lives. Many Martin County residents no longer read the local newspaper; and every action does not receive media coverage, much less comprehensive coverage. Radio and television coverage are rarely seen in Martin County. We retreat into our shells, look at social media and hope for the best. Besides, we think, “I can vote for the guy that I see in church or at the Elks.”