PINELAND PRAIRIE

 It appears that no one has a bad word to say about Pineland Prairie. Approximately 20 people spoke in favor at the meeting. From Jackie Trancynger to the Guardians to the head of the Builders Association, the speakers including myself urged, approval of the development. And why wouldn’t Martin County rally around this plan? It creates a walkable village and leaves 70% in open space or for schools.

This plan is a big PUD. The great thing about PUDs are that the Commission and staff can help direct what and how the property is developed. This isn’t proscribed to an extent that doesn’t leave an opportunity for all stakeholders to have a say. In my opinion, all development should be PUDs. So, you would think this would be a perfect opportunity for any Commissioner not just to scowl and criticize but try and incorporate their ideas and objections into the project.

In this instance I heard the complaints, but no one said I would like this or that included or eliminated. This, I believe, was a mistake on the Commission’s part. Mr. Kiplinger and his development team took the time (over a year) to meet with all. This was any and every Commissioner’s chance to have input into the development.

The final vote was 4-1 to approve with Commissioner Heard dissenting.

***

To subscribe to the entire newsletter for free: tomcampenniforstuart.com